PEER REVIEW PROCESS

For papers requiring amendments, the same reviewers will be used to ensure that the quality of the revised paper is acceptable.The Journal of Business Transformation and Strategy maintains peer review standards while improving process efficiency.

      All research articles published in the Journal of Business Transformation and Strategy undergo full peer review, with the main characteristics listed below:

  1. All research articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts.
  2. All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editor-in-Chief based on the review provided.
  3. Members of the international Editorial Board provide insight, advice and guidance to the Editor-in-Chief in general and assist in making decisions on specific manuscripts.
  4. Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide administrative support that enables the journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while providing fast turnaround and maximum efficiency for authors, reviewers, and editors.
  5. Journals also benefit from the high-quality peer review manuscript referral process carried out by established journals.

Peer review of refereed papers:

The Journal of Business Transformation and Strategy will immediately decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to refereed papers based on reviews and editorial insights from supporting journals. Additionally, Editors will have the option to request additional reviews if necessary. Authors will be notified when the Editor determines further review is necessary.

Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to the Journal of Business Transformation and Strategy will be fully reviewed by at least two qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or designated Editorial Board member will then decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

The editor will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Priority judgment will not be a factor in decision making, but all papers should make new additions or additions to the literature.