Hybrid Sampling: Menjembatani Representativitas dan Fleksibilitas dalam Penelitian Kontemporer

Authors

  • Taharuddin Magister Administrasi Bisnis, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20527/jbp.1414i2.93

Keywords:

Hybrid Sampling, Probability Sampling, Non-Probability Sampling, Research Methodology

Abstract

Abstract: Sample selection is a crucial component of research methodology because it determines the extent to which results can be generalized and justified. However, both probability and non-probability sampling have their limitations. Probability sampling excels at generating representative data but requires large costs and a complete sampling frame. Conversely, non-probability sampling is more flexible and resource-efficient but is often questioned for its validity and objectivity. Hybrid sampling emerges as a methodological strategy that combines the strengths of various sampling techniques to minimize their respective weaknesses. This article aims to examine the concept, urgency, and implications of hybrid sampling in contemporary research. The writing is conducted with a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to classical and contemporary methodological literature. The results of the study show that hybrid sampling is able to address population complexity, cost and time efficiency, and the need to balance generalization and depth of information. Its theoretical implication lies in expanding a more adaptive research methodology paradigm, while its practical implications are relevant for academic researchers and practitioners in social, health, and marketing fields. Thus, hybrid sampling is not just an alternative but an increasingly relevant methodological strategy in the modern research era

References

Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. (2023). Sampling and integration of mixed methods data [Video]. Michigan Medicine. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlFRTQpZi1s

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316.

Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430.

Published

06-10-2025

How to Cite

Taharuddin. (2025). Hybrid Sampling: Menjembatani Representativitas dan Fleksibilitas dalam Penelitian Kontemporer. JURNAL BISNIS DAN PEMBANGUNAN, 14(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbp.1414i2.93